148896 stories
·
0 followers

Russia begins 3 days of voting in a parliamentary election set to cement the Kremlin's power

1 Share

Russians on Friday began three days of voting in the country’s first wartime parliamentary election, which features virtually no opposition and is all but certain to secure the Kremlin’s political dominance.

Authorities spread the election over the weekend, ending Sunday, in a bid to boost turnout among the 111 million eligible voters, and they even allowed electronic balloting.

The Kremlin wants the parliamentary election — the first since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 — to underline public support for the war and give a veneer of legitimacy to its action. It has sought to avoid any political risks by stamping out even the slightest sign of dissent.

“Your choice and resolve will once again demonstrate that millions of people stand behind our fighters, that we are a united people, bound by shared values, historical memory, and love for the Motherland,” President Vladimir Putin told the nation before the vote.

AP correspondent Charles de Ledesma reports Russia has started three days of voting in a parliamentary election set to cement the Kremlin’s power.

Russian state news agencies reported that Putin voted online Friday and released a video of him in front of a computer screen.

The main Kremlin party, United Russia, is all but assured to retain its overwhelming control of the lower house, the State Duma. Several smaller parties of the “systemic opposition” that vote in sync with the government on all key issues also are expected to retain their presence.

Voters cast two separate ballots, filling half of the Duma’s 450 seats by selecting political parties listed on the ballot. The rest are contested in single-seat constituencies, with voters choosing individual candidates.

Some Russians hope for a different future

Russians interviewed by The Associated Press expressed different expectations from the election.

Dmitry Kirillin in Moscow said earlier this week that he would like “to see some changes. To see a different party” at the helm. But Muscovite Alexander Vertukhin believed “what United Russia and the communists are doing is quite sufficient; their platforms cover everything.”

Speaking at a Moscow polling station Friday, pensioner Galina Vavilova said she thought ending the war in Ukraine “is the main thing, of course.”

“That is the most important thing right now. Everyone wants peace, that’s what it comes down to. So that our guys are safe and sound,” she said.

Another pensioner, Lyudmila Kalinina, wished for life “to stabilize for the better” and for “an end to the big divide between the ultra-rich and the extremely poor, because, after all, many people don’t live a very sweet life.”

Vladimir Chubarev, a 72-year-old professor, expressed hope “for all the important initiatives our government is undertaking to succeed,” adding: “And, of course, for victory.”

Sign up for Morning Wire: Our flagship newsletter breaks down the biggest headlines of the day.

Russia has silenced anti-war voices

The liberal Yabloko party, the only registered political entity that dared to criticize the war, was removed from the ballot last month by Russia’s Supreme Court, and only has a few dozen candidates in the single-constituency races. Additionally, some anti-war politicians have been imprisoned or forced to flee abroad ahead of the campaign.

The election follows a summer of Ukraine’s long-range drone strikes on oil refineries that triggered a widespread fuel crisis. Warehouses belonging to online retailers Wildberries and Ozon also were attacked. The damage has exacerbated problems for the Russian economy and brought the war home for millions.

In Russia’s Black Sea resort of Sochi, polling stations were briefly closed because of a threat of a drone attack, local officials said. One polling station in the Krasnodar region had to be set up in a different venue after a drone shattered windows there, said Central Election Commission head Ella Pamfilova.

For the first time, the parliamentary election includes residents of four Ukrainian regions that Moscow illegally annexed after the war began, but still doesn’t fully control. Voting also is taking place in Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula that was illegally annexed by Russia in 2014.

Voters dropped their ballots in a box at one polling station in the Russian-held part of the Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine as an armed Russian soldier stood nearby and watched.

In the Russian-held Luhansk region, 14 polling stations were using backup power sources after Ukrainian drones damaged electrical lines, Pamfilova said.

Separately, Russian officials said Ukrainian attacks earlier this week killed a polling station chief and wounded another in the Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia region. There was no immediate comment from Ukraine on the accusation.

Authorities in Kyiv denounced the voting in the Russian-held areas as illegal and urged foreign governments and international organizations not to recognize the election, warning Ukrainians that taking part in organizing the balloting could carry criminal liability.

European Commission spokesperson Christian Wigand also called the voting in Russian-held regions “illegal” and said the European Union condemns it.

“These so-called elections represent yet another blatant violation of international law. The European Union does not, and will never recognize either the holding of these, so-called elections, sham elections, in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine or their results,” he said.

Wigand said the way the elections are held “underscores the continued and deepening erosion of democracy in Russia,” and that the Kremlin “deprives voters in Russia of a genuine choice about the future of their country.”

He also noted that Russia decided not to invite observers from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, disregarding its commitments. He vowed the EU will continue to support Russian civil society organizations, human rights groups and independent media.

——

Lorne Cook in Brussels contributed.

Read the whole story
Michael_Novakhov
26 minutes ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete

9/11 and the Second Chechen war

1 Share

The relationship between the September 11 attacks and the Second Chechen War (1999–2009) is one of the most significant geopolitical pivots of the early 2000s. It transformed a localized, highly criticized post-Soviet conflict into a recognized front of the global "War on Terror".

The connection between these two events manifest in two main ways: how 9/11 altered the geopolitical framing of the war, and how the war inadvertently shaped the 9/11 hijackers.


1. The Geopolitical Pivot: From "Brutal Suppression" to "War on Terror"

Before September 11, 2001, Western governments and human rights organizations heavily criticized Russia’s military campaign in Chechnya. Vladimir Putin—who rose to power largely on his promise to crush the Chechen separatist movement—was widely condemned for using disproportionate force and "scorched earth" tactics that leveled the capital city of Grozny.

The 9/11 attacks completely altered this dynamic:

  • A Political Realignment: Immediately after the attacks, Putin was the first foreign leader to call U.S. President George W. Bush to offer condolences and strategic alignment.
  • Reframing the Conflict: Moscow seized the moment to rebrand its campaign. What Russia previously described as an "anti-terrorist operation" against domestic separatists was reframed as a crucial frontline defense against international Islamist terrorism.
  • Silencing Western Criticism: In exchange for Russian intelligence cooperation and the use of Central Asian airspace for the war in Afghanistan, the U.S. and its European allies dramatically softened their rhetoric regarding human rights abuses in Chechnya.

2. The Operational Link: The Hamburg Cell's Original Plan

Paradoxically, the Second Chechen War played a direct role in the trajectory of the Hamburg cell—the core group of al-Qaeda pilots who executed the 9/11 attacks.

  • The Chechnya Plan: In late 1999, Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, Ziad Jarrah, and Ramzi bin al-Shibh were radicalized in Hamburg, Germany, largely by watching footage of jihadists fighting the Russian military in the early months of the Second Chechen War. Their initial, concrete intention was to travel to Russia to fight alongside Chechen rebels.
  • The Route to Afghanistan: To get to Chechnya, they were advised to travel through Pakistan. While en route, al-Qaeda operatives intercepted the group and redirected them to training camps in Afghanistan.
  • The Strategic Shift: It was during this detour that Osama bin Laden met the men, recognized their Western education and fluency in English and German, and selected them to spearhead the "planes operation" targeting the United States instead.

Summary of Interconnection

DimensionBefore 9/11After 9/11
Western Perception of ChechnyaCondemned as a brutal, disproportionate post-Soviet suppression of independence.Accepted as a legitimate campaign against international Islamic terrorism.
Putin's Global StandingIsolated and criticized for severe human rights abuses in the North Caucasus.Embraced as an essential partner in the global coalition against terror.
Al-Qaeda's Core PilotsMotivated by the Chechen war to join a defensive jihad against Russia.Intercepted in Afghanistan and retrained to attack American targets.

Ultimately, while the Second Chechen War served as the primary radicalizing catalyst that brought the 9/11 hijackers out of Europe and into al-Qaeda's ranks, the tragedy of 9/11 gave Russia the political cover it needed to prosecute the remainder of the Chechen war with minimal international interference.

AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses

Copied to clipboardFailed to copy to clipboard. Try again later.

Read the whole story
Michael_Novakhov
1 day ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete

The Chechen story is central in the Hamburg Cell plot. Does it indicate the involvement of FSB in the 9/11?

1 Share

Instead, it represents a pivotal, accidental detour in the hijackers' path from local radicalization to joining al-Qaeda.

According to the official 9/11 Commission Report, the "Chechen story" unfolded through a sequence of verified events:

1. The Original Goal was Chechnya, Not America

In late 1999, core members of the Hamburg Cell—including Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, and Ziad Jarrah—became intensely radicalized by videos of Russian military actions during the Second Chechen War. Their initial intent was exclusively to travel to Chechnya to fight alongside Muslim separatists against the Russian military. They had no known connection to al-Qaeda or any plans to attack the United States at that time.

2. The Train Encounter

While traveling on a German train east toward their intended destination, the cell members had a chance encounter with an al-Qaeda operative named Khalid al-Masri. Al-Masri convinced them that traveling directly into Chechnya was logistically too difficult due to closed borders and heavy Russian security.

He redirected them to a Mauritanian businessman named Mohamedou Ould Slahi, who advised them to travel first to Afghanistan to receive formal military training before trying to enter Chechnya.

3. The Hijacking by al-Qaeda

Once the Hamburg Cell arrived at al-Qaeda training camps in Kandahar, Afghanistan, their path changed permanently. Osama bin Laden and his military commanders realized that these men possessed rare, highly valuable traits for a transnational plot: they were fluent in Western languages, educated, and comfortable living in European societies.

Bin Laden personally intercepted them, informed them that they were not needed in Chechnya, and instead recruited them to become the operational core of the "Planes Operation"—which eventually became the 9/11 attacks.

Summary

The Chechen conflict served as the emotional catalyst for the Hamburg Cell's radicalization, but the connection was adversarial to Russia. Intelligence agencies and historians view the Chechen angle as evidence of how decentralized extremist networks operated at the time, rather than as an indicator of an FSB state-sponsored conspiracy.

Copied to clipboardFailed to copy to clipboard. Try again later.

Read the whole story
Michael_Novakhov
1 day ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete

The Chechen story is central in the Hamburg Cell plot. Does it indicate the involvement of FSB in the 9/11?

1 Share

AI Mode reply for The Chechen story is central in the Hamburg Cell plot. Does it indicate the involvement of FSB in the 9/11?

Rather, historical evidence and official investigations show that the core members of the Hamburg cell—including Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, and Ziad Jarrah—were originally radicalized by videos of the conflict in Chechnya and intended to fight Russian forces, but were independently redirected by al-Qaeda operatives toward the United States.

The Reality of the Chechen Connection

  • Original Intent: In late 1999, the core members of the Hamburg Cell decided to travel to Chechnya to join the Islamist separatist movement waging jihad against the Russian military in the Second Chechen War.
  • The Redirection: While trying to coordinate their journey, they had a chance encounter on a German train with an al-Qaeda facilitator (Khalid al-Masri) and received advice from other extremists. They were informed that entering Chechnya via the Russian border was too difficult and were instead advised to travel to Afghanistan first to receive training.
  • The Al-Qaeda Recruitment: Once they arrived at al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan, their technical skills, higher education, and fluency in Western languages caught the attention of Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden personally recruited them to act as the pilot-hijackers for the "Planes Operation," fundamentally shifting their target from Russia to the United States.

Why This Disproves FSB Involvement

Mainstream intelligence agencies, the 9/11 Commission Report, and independent geopolitical analysts have found no evidence linking the FSB to the Hamburg Cell's trajectory.

  • Opposing Strategic Goals: The Hamburg Cell's original goal was to kill Russian soldiers in Chechnya. The redirection of these highly capable individuals to Afghanistan—and ultimately to the U.S.—effectively removed an immediate threat to Russian national security.
  • Confusion with Separate Theories: Speculation regarding the FSB and terrorism usually stems from a completely separate event: the 1999 Russian apartment bombings. Critics of the Kremlin, such as poisoned former agent Alexander Litvinenko, alleged that the FSB orchestrated those specific domestic bombings as a false-flag operation to justify the Second Chechen War. However, there is no verified connective tissue linking those domestic Russian events to al-Qaeda's independent foreign operations against the United States.
  • Hamburg cell - Wikipedia

    Shortly after 9/11, German authorities found that the cell came up with the plan to hijack U.S. planes independently of al-Qaeda, ...

  • Planning of the September 11 attacks - Wikipedia

    1990s–2000: Hamburg cell * In 1992, an Egyptian architect named Mohamed Atta moved to Germany to study urban planning at universit...

  • Encounter on a Train Led Hamburg Cell to Bin Laden

    Aug 9, 2004 — HAMBURG -- Two years before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, the ringleaders of the plot had a different destinat...

Read the whole story
Michael_Novakhov
1 day ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete

FSB OPERATIONS OUTSIDE RUSSIA - Google Search

1 Share

AI Mode Conversation: FSB OPERATIONS OUTSIDE RUSSIA

FSB OPERATIONS OUTSIDE RUSSIA

AI Mode reply for FSB OPERATIONS OUTSIDE RUSSIA

While Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) is primarily a domestic security and counterintelligence agency, it has significantly expanded its footprint to conduct extensive foreign intelligence, sabotage, and assassination operations globally.

1. Institutional Architecture: The "Fifth Service"

The legal authority for the FSB to operate outside Russia is enshrined in the Russian Federal Laws "On Foreign Intelligence" and "On the Federal Security Service". These external operations are spearheaded by a dedicated wing within its structure:

  • The Fifth Service: Officially named the Service of Operational Information and International Relations (SOIMS), this arm is tasked with external human intelligence (HUMINT) and signals intelligence (SIGINT).
  • Leadership: As of 2024, the Fifth Service is headed by Alexei Komkov, who took over from Sergei Beseda. Beseda had led the unit since 2009 but faced intense scrutiny following the FSB’s intelligence failures during the lead-up to the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
  • The "Near Abroad": Historically, the FSB's Department for Operational Information (DOI) focused heavily on compiling data and conducting counterintelligence across former Soviet states (the CIS countries), taking over the mantle of the KGB's old Fifth Service.

2. Operational Methods and Cover

The FSB utilizes both deep-cover and official channels to embed its personnel abroad:

  • Unofficial Cover: The DOI aggressively deploys operatives using non-official cover, placing personnel inside foreign commercial companies, educational institutions, non-governmental organizations, and civilian government branches.
  • Diplomatic Cover: The Department of International Cooperation (UMS) places official FSB representatives directly inside Russian embassies. These operatives liaise with foreign law enforcement but also leverage ordinary diplomatic positions to shield officers executing subversive operations.
  • "Intelligence from the Territory": A preferred method involves initiating contact and recruiting targets (both foreign and Russian citizens) while they are physically within Russian territory, establishing long-term informant relationships before they travel abroad.

3. Recent Direct Action: Sabotage, Cyber, and Assassination

Intelligence analysts and recent Western indictments highlight a shift toward highly aggressive, sometimes reckless external operations that bypass traditional statecraft in favor of asymmetric warfare:

  • Transnational Murder-for-Hire Plots: In September 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice unsealed a major indictment charging five suspected Russian intelligence operatives. The unsealed filings detailed a sophisticated "RIS Network" that hired assets within the United States—including a surveillance asset in Brooklyn, New York—offering up to $40,000 to "eliminate" or "disappear" a prominent Russian dissident living in Washington, D.C.
  • European Infrastructure Sabotage: The same September 2026 U.S. indictment detailed a coordinated criminal network operating in Europe. The network has targeted civilian and military infrastructure across European nations aligned with Ukraine, executing arson attacks, localized acts of terrorism, and surveillance on critical logistics nodes.
  • Proxy and "Misfit" Recruitment: Rather than relying purely on highly trained elite officers for field tasks, the FSB increasingly recruits societal misfits, criminal proxies, or foreign nationals via encrypted platforms like Telegram. These assets are paid small bounties to photograph rail lines, plant localized explosives, or conduct low-level arson to trigger civil unrest and paranoia across the West.
  • Global Influence and Cyber Warfare: The FSB is repeatedly linked to state-sponsored cyberattacks, critical infrastructure penetration, and digital disinformation campaigns designed to destabilize foreign political systems and weaken allied support for Ukraine.

AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses

Copied to clipboardFailed to copy to clipboard. Try again later.

  • Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty·Preferred

    US Charges 5 In Russian Intelligence Sabotage And Assassination ...

    Sep 16, 2026 — Three others -- two Cuban men named Oemis Durruthy and Yaidel Suarez and a Venezuelan man Angel Castro -- were also charged. Durru...

  • Federal Security Service - Wikipedia

    Foreign intelligence According to some unofficial sources, since 1999, the FSB has also been tasked with the intelligence-gatherin...

  • Ex-CIA Chief: Inside Putin's Mafia State

    Sep 14, 2026 — Ex-CIA Chief: Inside Putin’s Mafia State it was the FSB that told Putin "Hey we can win this is going to be a quick war." Um. and ...

    Ex-CIA Chief: Inside Putin's Mafia State by Kyiv Post on YouTube

Read the whole story
Michael_Novakhov
1 day ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete

9/11, October 7, and the current state of the RUSSIAN STATE TERRORISM

1 Share

. Over the span of 25 years, the Kremlin has evolved from a partner in the global war on terror into an active perpetrator of state terrorism and an ally to transnational terror networks.


🏛️ The Post-9/11 Illusion: Tactful Cooperation

Immediately following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Russian President Vladimir Putin was the first foreign leader to call U.S. President George W. Bush.

  • Strategic Alignment: Putin offered intelligence sharing, opened airspace, and consented to U.S. military bases in Central Asia.
  • The Hidden Agenda: This cooperation was a transactional move. Putin used the global "War on Terror" framework to legitimize Russia's brutal, "scorched-earth" military campaigns in Chechnya, rebranding a domestic separatist conflict as a fight against international Islamist extremism.

🤝 The October 7 Pivot: Embracing Hamas

The October 7, 2023 terror attacks carried out by Hamas against Israel signaled the total disintegration of Russia's previous counterterrorism alignments.

  • Refusal to Condemn: Despite the deaths of at least 16 Russian citizens during the attacks, the Kremlin explicitly declined to condemn Hamas.
  • Strategic Partnership: Moscow hosted high-level Hamas delegations shortly after the massacre. Desperate to break out of Western isolation following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia chose to embrace regional chaos to curry favor with anti-Western factions in the Global South and align more tightly with Iran—Hamas's chief sponsor.

🛡️ The Current State of Russian State Terrorism (2026)

Today, Western intelligence agencies and international bodies increasingly classify Russia's actions not just as conventional warfare, but as state-sponsored terrorism. The current paradigm is defined by three main pillars:

1. Targeted Assassinations and Sabotage on Western Soil

The Kremlin's covert operations have expanded aggressively into Western homelands.

  • U.S. Soil Plots: In September 2026, federal indictments revealed that the FBI disrupted a Russian intelligence plot aimed at conducting targeted killings of specific officials within the United States using remote-controlled car bombs and concealed explosives.
  • Kinetic Campaigns: Intelligence reports from organizations like the Institute for the Study of War point to a decade-long, sustained kinetic campaign by Russian intelligence designed to physically incapacitate U.S. government personnel globally.

2. Hybrid Warfare and Infrastructure Attacks

Across Europe, Russia uses proxy networks, cyber operations, and paid saboteurs to attack civilian infrastructure. This includes arson attacks on commercial warehouses, GPS jamming affecting civilian aviation over the Baltic region, and plotted sabotage against European military bases and defense manufacturing sites.

3. Terror as a Standard Military Strategy

Within Ukraine, Russia continues to deploy a strategy where the terrorization of civilians is the goal, rather than a byproduct. This is executed through:

  • Systematic missile and drone strikes deliberately targeting the energy grid to freeze civilian populations.
  • The deliberate bombing of hospitals, schools, and residential buildings.

Summary of Geopolitical Evolution

EraRussia's PostureCore Motivation
Post-9/11 (2001)Condemned terrorism; aided the U.S. coalition.Validation for domestic campaigns in Chechnya; seeking a sphere of influence.
Post-October 7 (2023)Legitimized Hamas; aligned with Iran.Striking back at Western hegemony; securing allies in the Global South.
Current State (2026)Direct execution of sabotage, assassinations, and terror.Subverting Western solidarity; forcing a frozen conflict in Ukraine.

From tolerating the Taliban to partnering with Iran and harboring Hamas, the modern Russian state actively leverages transnational terrorism as a force multiplier for its own asymmetric warfare against the West.

Copied to clipboardFailed to copy to clipboard. Try again later.

Read the whole story
Michael_Novakhov
2 days ago
reply
http://michael_novakhov.newsblur.com/
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories